State Government planning reforms and changes to the development contribution system
|
Overall planning reforms |
|
In 2003, the Minister for Infrastructure, Planning and Natural Resources commissioned a number of taskforces to review key parts of the planning system. The reviews covered:
Key stakeholders and a planning reform reference group were consulted as part of this process. In December 2003, NCOSS made a submission to the taskforce responsible for reviewing the system of development contributions under Section 94 of the Act. In that submission we argued that developers who make a substantial profit from major residential and commercial developments should contribute to the provision of community facilities in such areas. NCOSS also advocated that a betterment tax should be introduced to obtain a similar contribution from landowners who benefit from the sale of rezoned land. Subsequently the State Government has announced a series of far-reaching changes to the planning system. In particular it has said that:
Further details on the overall planning reform agenda are set out on the Department of Planning website. |
| Changes to the system of development contributions |
|
As far as the social and community services sector is concerned, the biggest effect of the planning reform process is likely to flow from changes to the system of development contributions managed by local Councils and other consent authorities. These changes flow from the Environmental Planning &Assessment Amendment (Development Contributions) Act 2005, which came into force on 8 July 2005. The amendment Act extends the means by which councils and other planning authorities can obtain and use development contributions. The changes offer two extra ways for development contributions to be obtained, by:
The traditional imposition of section 94 contributions as a condition of development consent remains as a third option. Other changes provide for joint contribution plans for development projects that cross Council boundaries, and for Councils to borrow funds held in separate Section 94 accounts so as to speed up the provision of essential infrastructure. These changes have generally been welcomed by local government. NCOSS is disappointed that the legislation does not empower Councils to impose a mandatory levy for the contribution of affordable housing. We have also challenged the Government to clarify the availability of additional recurrent state funding for community facilities, such as neighbourhood centres, constructed by Councils using Section 94 developer contributions. The Department of Planning has produced a comprehensive set of practice notes on the revised system of developer contributions. |
| Information |
|
[top]
Council of Social Service of New South Wales
66 Albion St, Surry Hills NSW 2010, Australia
tel (02) 9211 2599, fax (02) 9281 1968, emailAll information contained on this web site is copyright
Page maintained by[Home]